Oct 14 2017

SYSK Selects: Is there such a thing as a truth serum?

Selects 37 min 4 movies discussed
Listen

In this week's SYSK Select episode, ever since people have had secrets, other people have been looking for ways to get it out of them. Law enforcement and chemistry alike have searched for a drug that can remove the ability to lie. Join Josh and Chuck as they check in to see how it's going.

AI Summary

In this episode, Josh and Chuck explore the fascinating and surprisingly complicated history of so-called "truth serums"—drugs that authorities have used for decades hoping to extract honest confessions from suspects, criminals, and spies. They trace the journey from scopolamine in the 1920s through barbiturates and even stimulants, revealing that despite their reputation, these drugs don't actually guarantee truth and are riddled with ethical and practical problems. The guys dig into why these substances became infamous in popular culture, how they've actually been used in real interrogations (including the famous MKUltra program), and why courts have largely rejected them as unreliable evidence, all while examining the peculiar case of James Holmes that sparked the episode in the first place.


Movies Discussed

On the Road
On the Road
2012 2h 22m
★ 5.6
"I just saw that on the road movie. This made me think of that. — Discussion of the movie adaptation of Jack Kerouac's novel and Neal Cassady's story, noting it's faithful to the book."
Saturday Night Live
Saturday Night Live
1975
★ 7.0
"Do you remember Goat Boy from SNL? Yes. What was his name? Jim Brewer? — Josh references the SNL character Goat Boy, which Chuck performed or is being compared to in their conversation." — Josh
Side Effects
Side Effects
2013 R 1h 46m
★ 6.6
"Have you seen side effects? Not yet. It's good. — Chuck recommends the movie Side Effects in response to a discussion about faking conditions under drugs." — Chuck
Zero Dark Thirty
Zero Dark Thirty
2012 2h 37m
★ 7.0
"Like in Zero Dark Thirty? Yeah, exactly. — Chuck references Zero Dark Thirty as an example of interrogators lying to suspects about confessions during drugged states." — Chuck

💬 Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first!